
In 2026, penalties linked to EPR (extended producer responsibility) non-compliance are no longer theoretical. High fine amounts, daily penalty payments and structured checks bring regulatory pressure to an unprecedented level.
Ignoring or underestimating these obligations can cost tens of thousands of euros and damage your reputation for a long time. Understanding the penalties and identifying your vulnerabilities is therefore a strategic priority.
Reading time: ~13 min
The EPR scheme requires producers to fund and organise the end of life of many products: packaging, textiles, electrical equipment, furniture, building materials, toys, sports goods, and more. As soon as you sell, import or have these products manufactured, you must contribute to managing their waste.
In 2026, the scope widens and checks rely on several levers:
Producer status (own brand, importer, online seller, distributor applying its own brand) is enough to be penalised, even if you thought the responsibility lay with your suppliers.
Three categories of financial penalties: administrative fines, daily penalty payments and retroactive adjustments.

Up to €7,500 per unit or tonne placed on the market without declaration: an immediate impact on cash flow and margin.
A fine of up to €30,000; risk of being blocked by certain customers and a reputation for unreliability.
Up to €30,000 and an obligation to quickly correct invoices, terms and conditions and online materials.
A daily penalty of up to €20,000 after formal notice: a financial drain until the situation is resolved.
Contribution adjustments plus penalties: retroactive correction over several years and tension with the PRO.
A producer who has placed several hundred tonnes of packaging on the market over three financial years without joining a scheme or declaring can accumulate several hundred thousand euros in fines, on top of contributions owed.
1. Selling EPR products without joining a scheme. Example: importing electrical equipment, furniture or toys without registering with the relevant EPR scheme.
2. UIN held but declarations incomplete or incorrect. Poorly declared volumes or forgotten sales channels lead to contribution adjustments and administrative fines.
3. UIN withdrawn or suspended. In case of repeated non-payment, you become non-compliant again, complicating your business relationships.
4. Distributor or marketplace managing third-party sellers poorly. Formal notice, product listing suspension or financial penalty are possible.
5. Repeated declaration delays. Late filings justify targeted investigations and penalties.
Authorities no longer hesitate to sanction: Alcome (€466,000) and Dastri (€450,000) have already been fined. The Conforama case also illustrates the reputational impact.
The 2025 packaging declarations had to be filed between 1 January and 31 March 2026; this data feeds into the 2026 provisional invoice. Any delay draws the attention of the producer responsibility organisation (PRO) or the administration.

The government considers the current regime insufficiently deterrent and wants to shorten the delay (up to three years today) between detection and sanction, increasing the risk for businesses adopting a wait-and-see approach.
In 2026, data is cross-checked more systematically, political pressure is increasing and the first high-profile cases serve as a warning. Postponing your compliance by a year means playing with fire.
Loss of contracts. Clients and public buyers require proof of your compliance; the absence of a UIN can cost you a tender.
Blocking on e-commerce platforms. Amazon and other marketplaces suspend the product listings of non-compliant sellers.
Emergency compliance costs. Reconstructing several years of history mobilises your teams and costly external consultants.
Reputational damage. A public sanction for environmental non-compliance erodes the trust of consumers and investors.
There is still time to turn this risk into an opportunity to structure your data and processes:
Map your flows and identify all the EPR schemes concerned
Check your producer status for each flow
Obtain or update your UIN and mention it on all your materials
Check your memberships and declarations with the producer responsibility organisations
Ensure the accuracy of your product data and the quantities you place on the market
Define clear governance for annual declarations
A detailed method is available in this article. For large catalogues, solutions like Compliancr automate scheme identification and data centralisation.

Obligations depend on producer status, not turnover. Even with modest volumes, a formal notice can be very burdensome for a small business.
Yes. A proactive approach with the producer responsibility organisations and the administration is viewed more favourably, often limits the severity of sanctions and can help you avoid the daily penalty.
Both. Alcome and Dastri have been sanctioned, but this does not exempt producers: your own declarations must be accurate and complete.
Do not wait: compare your products against the list of EPR schemes, ask the producer responsibility organisations and, if needed, get support to map your obligations precisely.
The 2026 EPR sanctions combine fines, daily penalties and retroactive regularisations. The longer you wait, the more you expose yourself. Check our resources on extended producer responsibility and our solutions to secure your compliance.